HAS THE RESPONSE TO THE VIRUS DESTROYED OUR HEALTHCARE?

HAS THE RESPONSE TO THE VIRUS DESTROYED OUR HEALTHCARE?

  • Post author:
  • Post category:Blog

By Kate Brownlie, List Candidate for REFORM UK Scotland, Highlands and Islands, 6th May 2021

Even before the coronavirus fear response closed down businesses, schools and hospitals and sent waiting lists through the roof – including for life-saving surgery – health care services were already under stress. Despite advances in technology, the majority of patients today receive a poorer service compared to that available in the 1950s and 60s when it was commonplace for a GP to make home visits. The coronavirus debacle has made things markedly worse and has all but destroyed what was left of professional health care for the 99%. Some will say that life expectancy has improved, however this is mainly due to a lack of infant mortality compared with the past. Many Victorians lived to a ripe old age and into their 70s, 80s and beyond. Just check out any old graveyards and you will see, it’s true. It was getting past childhood that was the hard part.

Clean drinking water and proper sewage systems also greatly reduced serious infectious diseases like cholera – a big killer in the 19th century. It was not vaccinations that reduced the number of deaths from contagious vectors, it was better living conditions. Death rates were falling long before vaccinations were introduced. Of course this is not what is taught. You have been sold that vaccines are a panacea, without which mankind would surely have perished. Left to its own devices, the body actually mounts a more complex and longer lasting response to a wild virus – such as measles – than it does to the manufactured species of measles in a vaccine. So they have a place but they’re not the be-all-and-end-all. And the new ones are not really vaccines at all; they are a form of gene intervention using DNA or messenger RNA (mRNA) to modify your own cells and trick them into making spike proteins (hopefully, to prime the immune system. Hmmm). This has never been done before and to save time, the animal trials were skipped and Emergency Use Authorisation (EUA) was granted because a state of urgency had already been declared. 

This means that full approval of the new ‘vaccines’ cannot occur until 2023, once the human trials are complete. So everyone is currently taking part in a novel medical Stage 3 trial – you’re either in the active (vaccinated) group or the control (unvaccinated) group and the data is being very carefully collated by an expensive artificial intelligence program. This is not being made clear to people who have the right to fully informed consent and protection from a range of human rights legislation. Does ‘My body, My choice’ not apply here then? Yes it does. No medical procedures or experiments may be carried out without your full consent. No exceptions. Court cases are now rattling at the gates.

Edinburgh, Scotland, UK. 9 March 2021. Pictured: Kate Brownlie. Candidate photos and photoshoot for Reform UK Scotland Party for the up and coming Holyrood Scottish Parliamentary Elections in May 2021. Michelle Ballantyne MSP is Leader of the Party. Credit: Colin Fisher

Just to be clear, these are not typical attenuated live virus products that are being administered – they are completely new experimental interventions whose outcomes are as yet unknown. Normally a vaccine has to meet two key criteria – a) it should prevent you from contracting the disease and b) it should prevent you from transmitting the disease to others. These do neither of these things. All they claim to do is to reduce symptoms if you contract the virus. One dictionary that I know of – Merriam Webster’s – has just recently introduced a secondary definition to cover this new type.

Now we all know what has happened with antibiotics over the years; these are often not as useful now as they once were. Overprescribing and their wholesale, routine use on farm animals as well as humans, has meant that antibiotics which once saved lives are now often inadequate or useless. Several vaccine specialists have spoken out to state that prophylactic vaccines should not be used in the midst of a ‘pandemic’ scenario because it encourages the creation of variants. Basically they are saying that the virus may mutate under pressure and cause further problems. Others claim that care home residents who managed to stay ‘virus free’ all year, are now testing positive for Covid after being vaccinated. Nurses under stress are leaving the profession, because they were embarrassed by people ‘clapping for NHS’ whilst their hospitals were empty, yet now they are being threatened with the loss of their jobs if they speak out about the neurological vaccine damage that they are now seeing. It’s all a bit of a mess. The jury is still out and won’t be reporting for a while yet. Stay safe!